mirror of
https://github.com/lobehub/lobe-chat.git
synced 2025-12-20 01:12:52 +08:00
0a8c80dfd2
* add * baseline * ✅ test(store): add tests for discover store plugin and mcp slices - Add comprehensive tests for discover/slices/plugin/action.ts (15 tests) - Add comprehensive tests for discover/slices/mcp/action.ts (11 tests) - Update test-coverage.md with new metrics and completed work - Coverage: 74.24% overall (+26 tests, 2 new test files) - Action files coverage: 29/40 tested (72.5%, +2 files) Features tested: - Plugin/MCP categories, detail, identifiers, and list fetching - SWR key generation with locale and parameters - SWR configuration verification - Service integration with discoverService 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * 📝 docs(testing): add SWR hooks testing guide and subagent workflow Testing Guide Updates: - Add comprehensive SWR hooks testing section with examples - Document key differences from regular action tests - Add examples for testing SWR key generation and configuration - Add examples for testing conditional fetching - Update references to include SWR hook test examples Test Coverage Guide Updates: - Add detailed subagent workflow for parallel testing - Document when and how to use subagents for testing - Add complete workflow example using subagents - Add benefits and best practices for subagent usage - Clarify that subagents should NOT commit or update docs - Add step-by-step guide for launching parallel subagents Key improvements: - Better documentation for testing SWR-based store actions - Clear workflow for efficient parallel testing using subagents - Single atomic commit strategy after all subagents complete - Improved testing efficiency and organization 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * ♻️ refactor(test): fix SWR mock strategy to properly test fetcher Previously, tests were hardcoding return values instead of calling the fetcher function. This bypassed the actual service call logic. Changes: - Fix useSWR mock to call fetcher and return its Promise - Update assertions to await Promise results - Update testing guide with correct mock pattern - Add explanation of why this approach is correct Before (incorrect): ```typescript useSWRMock.mockImplementation(((key, fetcher) => { fetcher?.(); // Call but ignore result return { data: mockData }; // Hardcoded }) as any); expect(result.current.data).toEqual(mockData); ``` After (correct): ```typescript useSWRMock.mockImplementation(((key, fetcher) => { const data = fetcher?.(); // Get Promise from fetcher return { data }; // Return Promise }) as any); const resolvedData = await result.current.data; expect(resolvedData).toEqual(mockData); ``` Benefits: - ✅ Actually tests the fetcher function - ✅ Mirrors real SWR behavior (data is Promise) - ✅ Service calls are properly verified - ✅ Tests are more accurate and maintainable Updated files: - .cursor/rules/testing-guide/zustand-store-action-test.mdc - src/store/discover/slices/plugin/action.test.ts - src/store/discover/slices/mcp/action.test.ts 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * 🐛 fix(test): correct SWR mock strategy to match project standards - Remove useSWR mocking, use real SWR implementation instead - Only mock service methods (fetchers) with vi.spyOn - Use waitFor for async assertions - Update testing guide with correct SWR pattern - Add reference to src/store/chat/slices/message/action.test.ts This fixes the incorrect mocking approach from previous commits. All 13 tests pass with the corrected strategy. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * ✅ test(store): add comprehensive tests for high priority action files - Add mcpStore action tests (41 tests, 624 LOC covered) - MCP plugin installation flow (normal, resume, dependencies, config) - Connection testing (HTTP and STDIO) - Plugin lifecycle management - Error handling and cancellation flows - Add fileManager action tests (35 tests, 205 LOC covered) - File upload and processing workflows - Chunk embedding and parsing - File list management and refresh - SWR data fetching Testing approach: - Used parallel subagents for efficient development - Followed zustand testing patterns from guide - Proper test layering and per-test mocking - All tests pass type-check and lint Coverage improvement: 74.24% → ~76% (+76 tests, 2 files) Action files: 29/40 → 31/40 tested (77.5%) 🏆 Milestone: All high priority files (>200 LOC) now have tests! 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * ✅ test(store): complete 100% action file coverage with 160 new tests Added comprehensive tests for all remaining 9 medium-priority action files: Discovery Store (33 tests): - assistant/action.ts: 10 tests (SWR hooks, categories, detail, identifiers, list) - provider/action.ts: 11 tests (SWR hooks, detail with readme, identifiers, list with filters) - model/action.ts: 12 tests (SWR hooks, categories, detail, identifiers, list with params) Knowledge Base Store (29 tests): - crud/action.ts: 19 tests (create, update, remove, refresh, loading states, SWR hooks) - content/action.ts: 10 tests (add files, remove files, error handling) File Store (36 tests): - upload/action.ts: 18 tests (base64 upload, file upload with progress, type detection, KB integration) - chunk/action.ts: 18 tests (drawer management, highlight, semantic search) AI Infrastructure Store (23 tests): - aiModel/action.ts: 23 tests (CRUD, batch operations, remote sync, toggle enabled, SWR hooks) Chat Store (39 tests): - thread/action.ts: 39 tests (CRUD, messaging, AI title generation, validation, loading states) Testing approach: - Used 9 parallel subagents for efficient development - Followed zustand testing patterns from guide - SWR hook testing for discovery slices - Complex async flows with proper error handling - File operations with progress callbacks - Semantic search and RAG integration Coverage improvement: ~76% → ~80% (+160 tests, 9 files) Action files: 31/40 → 40/40 tested (100%) 🎉 MILESTONE: All 40 action files now have comprehensive test coverage! 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix test * fix test * fix context-engine * add tests * remove * remove tools bar * pin bun version * fix --------- Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
22 lines
563 B
Plaintext
22 lines
563 B
Plaintext
lockfile=false
|
|
resolution-mode=highest
|
|
|
|
ignore-workspace-root-check=true
|
|
enable-pre-post-scripts=true
|
|
|
|
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*@umijs/lint*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*changelog*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*commitlint*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*eslint*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*postcss*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*prettier*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*remark*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*semantic-release*
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=*stylelint*
|
|
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=@auth/core
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=@clerk/backend
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=@clerk/types
|
|
public-hoist-pattern[]=pdfjs-dist
|